What to make of 2006?
I am not a fan of long winded serenades to calander years gone by. It is better to view the world through fixed events rather than artificial things like calander years. Of course, that is not to say 31 December isn't a good excuse to leave the house and stay awake 'til late.
For some time now I've believed that much of what makes the world both a heaven and hell derives from recurring themes. Despite this, every generation seems eager to claim that the latest episode in human development will herald a new age or reflects some major shift. The Bush Presidency is a case in point. The criminal invasion of Iraq is not unprecedented (remember Vietnam... the conquest of the Philippines... and the Spanish-American war which was the United States's very first 'pre-emptive' war). Nor does the slight shift in the Republican balance of power in the American political system (the Democrats now control both houses of the American parliament) represent a major change in American power.
My prism is power, the media that spins this emperor's invisible clothes, and its effects on everyday life. Nothing much within this prism changed during 2006, although yes, it is true, some positive changes did occur. Perhaps the most significant positive development was the increase in popular consciousness of the greenhouse effect, thanks in large part to Al Gore's documentary An inconventient truth. The documentary succeeded where others (such as Fahrenheit 9/11) failed in that it did not insult the audience. Yes An inconvenient truth was a propaganda film. It propagated a certain way of thinking - that we need to radically change our energy consumption lest we end human life on the planet. But it did so basically by informing the viewer, trying to reduce the issues at play, and, in so doing, treated the viewing public as equals. It made us feel like we are a vital ingredient in the recipe for saving the planet. It told us that we are part of the problem and, also, part of the solution. That is a rare message in today's public landscape.
Progressive movements often make the mistake of telling us about injustice or other bad things in a manner that excludes. We are told endless tales of intrigue, greed, fanaticism and outright criminality as though we are but a captive audience who can but only watch and scream and then retire to our sofas or bedrooms. This is far from an inaccurate portrayal, but it is far from totally accurate. Nor is it particularly helpful. Arguably, such messages can do more harm than good. What is needed along with our messages is an emphasis on participation. Every bit does make a difference. Everyone does hold, in their tiny little hand, the seeds of growth and destruction. We, all of us, hold the destiny of humanity in our grasp.
All the best for 2007 one and all! May you meet your challenges with grace and courage and receive your just rewards.
6 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nice post.
p.s. your picture is better than mine. darn your fancy camera and its sunset option!
Wuhahaha (evil laugh) :-) Still, wish I captured the sun while it was still up. Can't believe how quickly it sunk into the ocean.
Happy new year to you, sir.
I haven't seen An Inconvienient Truth. But now feel I should. I also found Jared Diamond's Collapse very helpful in the way I view environmental issues. Prior to Collapse, I always thought that it was a choice between development and the environment. But Diamond certainly changed my view point on this. And does so in a way that is rather empowering too.
Would be interested in your opinion if you have read the book.
Anyone ever tell you that you think too much? :D
Best wishes for 2007 mate!
Jase - all the time mate, all the time :-)
VP - welcome back! I'd say you wouldn't learn anything new from An inconvenient truth but the manner in which is it put together is very good. I think it serves as a good model for documentary as advocacy.
I haven't read Collapse but I did see some of the documentary based on it. I think Diamond's done a great job in fleshing out the broad links between human development and the natural habitat. The funny thing is that most of us are so insulated in our narrow little 'human' world that it's difficult to think of ourselves in terms of ecological footprints, etc. But I think that's slowly changing.
Post a Comment
<< Home