Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Beyond a joke

Problems have brewed for Denmark over the publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet wearing a turban that looks like a bomb. Islam expressly forbids any depiction of the Prophet, and caricatures are considered blasphemous. The Arab League has been in contact with the UN about adopting a 'binding resolution' banning contempt of religious beliefs.

May I be the first to say that the first sign of wavering faith is the inability to countenance criticism of it? Yes, the cartoon is likely racist, and I suspect there are more tasteful ways to lampoon a religion. But seriously, aren't there more pressing concerns? Should the 'Jesus Christ' character from South Park be similarly condemned (remember, he's slept with Eric Cartman's mother!)? Reading such stories is quite frustrating for someone like myself. Western progressives are the natural allies of moderate Muslims, and it is unlikely this quarter will dare say anything much too critical of the response to the Danish cartoons. But seriously, are Muslims so intolerant, yes intolerant!, and so lacking a sense of humour that we cannot even accept cartoon images of the Prophet, even where they are caricatures?

I imagine the real answer to this question is no. We aren't that intolerant, and yes, we do have a sense of humour. But as usual, the self-proclaimed moral arbiters of the faith are vociferous and vocal, and the rest of us dare not contradict them.

In any belief system, what really matters is one's own journey towards self actualisation - becoming that person which your belief system says you ought to be. Therefore, it is really quite secondary whether others are critical of or lampoon your beliefs. Yes, I can see that protecting religious and ethnic groups from vilification is important. But something like a cartoon. Seriously, get a life Arab League.

13 Comments:

At 8:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Salam!

Well, Iqbal. You forgot to mention the little bit in The Family Guy Movie where Stuart time travels back to see Jesus, only to find that his skills were severely overrated. That made me laugh.

I agree to a certain extent about the first sign of wavering faith is the inability to countenance criticism of it... But then, I think there is also a marked difference between internal piss-taking within the culture, and then piss-taking from OTHER cultures, no?

Oh yeah, and I want you to meet my friend Qasim. http://kabulog.blogspot.com. A Pakistani American, and also a lawyer. Working here in Kabul. :)

 
At 12:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice post. Looks like we're in agreement on this one. ;-)

 
At 10:43 AM, Blogger thabet said...

Could a similar representation of a Jewish figure be made in an European newspaper? Probably not. Though Catholics might argue that they come in for similar ridicule.

The best strategy for a religious Muslim in a situation like this is either to:

1. Totally ignore it, like Canadian Muslims seemed to do with Manji and British Muslims should have done with Rushdie (of which I am still to be convinced that _The Satanic Verses_ was an "attack on Islam"). Patience is also a religious value.

2. To pen a response, like some Muslims did in response to the Rushdie affair -- but were hypocritically ignored by the established British media

3. Or simply use the thing that hurts modern liberal societies most -- economics.

 
At 3:06 AM, Blogger BlueCollarLawyer said...

Well said Mustafa.

Rather amusingly, caricatures of Jesus have come under attack in the past by the US Christian Right. Thinking back a few years, I recall one particular website, famous for its funny photographs, hosting a drawn image of a young child kneeling front of Jesus - the boy's head resting on his saviour's lap. The caption read 'Come to Jesus, and he'll cum for you'.

Tasteless? Yes .. but nothing to issue a 'fatwah' over as is customary amongst some hardline Islamist groups.

 
At 6:59 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

Vasco - thanks for the link, always keen to meet like minded Pakistanis/Desis/Muslims/humans/and so on. Will continue the conversation via e-mail shortly.

LVD - yeah it's a constant frustration that. I guess I am a little more sympathetic on this sorts of issues though. Viz, difficult for progressives from the 'dominant group' to get into these sorts of debates. Which is why progressive minority group members (who are typically privileged such as I) have a greater responsibility to stand up to this sort of nonsense.

Safiyyah - yay! (re agreement) Just noticed a similar post on your blog. I have to apologise for not checking out your blog more often recently.

Thabet - an important question to ask. Perhaps the most powerful argument anti-semites have is the obvious double standards vis-a-vis racial vilification. A good example is the comedian Sacha Baron Cohen. He has a character named Borat who lampoons Kazakhstan. I find him (and Cohen's other work) hilarious. He's one of my favourite comedians (alongside Woody Allen, Peter Sellers and John Safran, et al). Yet if Cohen did a similar character lampooning an ignorant, orthodox Jew there would be widespread condemnation.

Bluecollar - thanks mate. And thanks for blowing my cover. Should I expect Mossad to knock on my door within the hour?

 
At 2:58 AM, Blogger Stephen said...

Thabet's point is a good one; it's unlikely mainstream (or widely read periodicals for that matter) could publish anti-semitic material.

Irfan Yusuf writes an interesting parallel of today's situation with the Crusades.

 
At 7:39 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

Thanks for the link. Irfan is a family friend who seems to be going from strength to strength. About time too, he's very articulate.

 
At 1:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are a fucking traitor. You are a paki pig.

 
At 8:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Racist is way too strong a word to use for a handful of blasphemous cartoons.

In the not too distant past the punishment for lampooning our leaders, whether they be kings or sultans, was death.

Now we lapoon George Dubya, Tony Blair and so on as we like. It is up to religions, and that includes Islam, to show the same maturity.

The rabid demonstrations that we see over the cartoons merely confirm in the minds of many that Muslims are a savage and uncultivated people.

What a terrible pity.

 
At 7:50 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

Yes it's an incredible tragedy. Mind you, I suspect the media has been scowering the news waves for every example of violence to some how tie it to the cartoons. I haven't tracked that of course, that's just my suspicion. Even if the media has done that, it's still disgraceful.

Further, we should be clear here. We're really talking about sexually frustrated males in Muslim-majority countries where unemployment is high taking to the street. Why don't we analyse the present violence in those terms? Why must Islam be badged with all of these problems? Just a thought, interested in (non-anonoymous) thoughts.

 
At 11:48 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

G'day WBB. Sounds like that was a rather indelicate social interaction you had there!

I don't think the sexual frustration issue is unique to Muslim youths. For example it isn't a coincidence that the people who were involved in the Cronulla riots were boozed up young man likely with oodles of sexual frustration of their own. But that is not to say it isn't relevant in the present context (people going ape shit over cartoons). So is unemployment. As is an underlying, deep-seated resentment towards the West's interactions with the Middle East.

 
At 1:27 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

Hey I didn't realise that dude is still around!! I find it particularly difficult to consider sexual freedom alongside the Bhagwan's image.

 
At 7:06 AM, Blogger Iqbal Khaldun said...

Evil Zionists, isn't that a tautology? (Joke)

Sorry you lost me there. The comment you refer to was a flippant remark; I was refering to his appearance. As in, the last thing I think about when I see that dude is sex.

So what's the story with the biological weapons use in local elections??

 

Post a Comment

<< Home